Read the original article here.

---

Hyperjacking: Taking Control of the Digital Underworld's Foundation

Welcome to "The Forbidden Code," where we delve into the obscure corners of computing that lie beyond the standard curriculum. Today, we're uncovering Hyperjacking – a deep-level attack technique targeting the very foundation of modern computing infrastructure: virtualization. This isn't the kind of vulnerability you patch by running Windows Update. It's about hijacking the master controller, the digital puppet master pulling the strings for entire networks of virtual machines. Understanding this requires thinking about systems in layers, and how compromising the lowest layer grants ultimate power.

What is Hyperjacking?

At its core, Hyperjacking is about seizing control of the critical software layer that manages virtual environments.

Hypervisor (also known as Virtual Machine Monitor - VMM): This is a layer of software, firmware, or hardware that creates and runs virtual machines (VMs). It's the fundamental component of virtualization, acting as the orchestrator that allocates hardware resources (CPU, memory, storage, network) to multiple VMs and isolates them from each other and the underlying hardware. Think of it as the operating system for operating systems.

Hyperjacking targets this hypervisor. The attacker aims to install or gain control over a malicious hypervisor layer positioned beneath the virtual machines, allowing their code to run undetected by the operating systems running inside the VMs.

Virtual Machine (VM): A software-based emulation of a physical computer system. It can run its own operating system and applications just like a physical machine, but it exists as a set of files on a host machine and is managed by a hypervisor.

VM Host: The physical computer system (server) on which one or more virtual machines run. This host runs the hypervisor software.

The insidious nature of Hyperjacking lies in its stealth. Because the attacker controls the layer below the virtualized operating systems, standard security tools and monitoring running within the VMs are completely blind to the compromise. From the perspective of the applications and users inside a VM, everything appears normal, while the attacker has complete control over their environment, network traffic, and data at a fundamental level.

Why Target the Hypervisor? The Power of the Underlayer

In the world of "Forbidden Code," targeting the lowest possible layer offers maximum privilege and stealth. The hypervisor is the single point of control for all VMs running on a host server.

• Ultimate Control: Gaining access to the hypervisor means the attacker can inspect, modify, redirect, or shut down any VM running on that host. They can access the memory and storage of any VM, effectively bypassing any security measures implemented within the VM's operating system.
• Stealth: As mentioned, security software running inside a VM operates under the assumption that it is running directly on hardware or a benevolent hypervisor. It has no visibility into the hypervisor layer itself. A malicious hypervisor can hide its presence, manipulate data streams, and maintain persistence without triggering alerts from guest operating systems.
• Single Point of Failure: For large data centers and cloud providers that rely heavily on virtualization, the hypervisor is a critical single point of failure. Compromising it provides access to potentially hundreds or thousands of virtual machines and the sensitive data they contain.

How Hyperjacking Can Be Achieved

Hyperjacking attacks generally fall into a few categories, all aiming to gain control of the hypervisor layer:

1. Injecting a Rogue Hypervisor: This involves inserting a malicious hypervisor layer below the original hypervisor or even the host operating system (in Type 2 virtualization scenarios). The original system structure is subtly altered, placing the attacker's code at the lowest level of control. This is conceptually similar to the "Blue Pill" proof-of-concept attack, which aimed to move the OS into a VM and run a malicious VMM beneath it.

   Blue Pill Attack: A proof-of-concept rootkit technique presented by Joanna Rutkowska, demonstrating the possibility of using hardware virtualization features (like Intel VT or AMD-V) to move a running operating system into a virtual machine, while a tiny, undetectable malicious hypervisor runs beneath it, controlling everything.

2. Directly Obtaining Control of the Original Hypervisor: This method involves exploiting vulnerabilities in the existing, legitimate hypervisor software itself. If an attacker can find a flaw (e.g., buffer overflow, configuration error, privilege escalation bug), they might be able to gain administrative access to the hypervisor. Once they have root access to the hypervisor, they effectively control the entire virtualized environment.

3. Running a Rogue Hypervisor on Top of an Existing Hypervisor: While less common and potentially more detectable depending on the specific hypervisor architecture, this theoretical approach involves installing a malicious hypervisor as a guest on the existing hypervisor, but one that somehow gains elevated privileges or tricks the legitimate hypervisor into routing sensitive operations through it. This is often considered more complex to achieve reliably and stealthily compared to subverting the original hypervisor.

The Anatomy of a Theoretical Hyperjacking Attack

Let's visualize a potential (simplified) attack chain for exploiting a vulnerability in the hypervisor:

1. Initial Foothold: The attacker first needs access to the VM host machine or a privileged management interface connected to it. This could be achieved through:

   • Exploiting a vulnerability in a network service exposed by the host.
   • Phishing an administrator for credentials.
   • Exploiting a vulnerability in a management tool running on the host or connected to the hypervisor.
   • Exploiting a vulnerability in a guest VM that allows breaking out of the VM and affecting the hypervisor (a Virtual Machine Escape).

   Virtual Machine Escape: An attack where an attacker running code inside a virtual machine is able to break out of the VM's isolation and interact with or gain control over the underlying hypervisor or host system.

2. Privilege Escalation (within the Host/Hypervisor context): Once on the host, the attacker needs to escalate their privileges to the level required to interact directly with or modify the hypervisor software or configuration. This might involve exploiting local vulnerabilities in the host OS (if it's a Type 2 hypervisor) or specific vulnerabilities in the hypervisor's management agents or kernel modules (for Type 1 hypervisors).

3. Hypervisor Compromise: Using the elevated privileges, the attacker can now:

   • Install a malicious rootkit or module directly into the running hypervisor process or kernel.
   • Modify hypervisor configuration files to redirect operations.
   • Replace hypervisor binaries with malicious versions (if the host OS is compromised).
   • Leverage hardware virtualization features to insert a rogue VMM beneath the original (as in the Blue Pill concept).

4. Establish Persistence and Control: The attacker ensures their malicious code survives reboots and maintains control. This could involve patching the hypervisor's boot process or installing malicious drivers/modules that load early.

5. Malicious Operations: With control of the hypervisor, the attacker can now perform actions hidden from the VMs:

   • Snoop on network traffic between VMs or between VMs and the external network.
   • Access or modify the memory and disk images of any running VM.
   • Inject malicious code or commands into VMs.
   • Create new, hidden VMs for their own use.
   • Manipulate resource allocation to disrupt specific VMs or grant priority to their own activities.

Real-World Significance: From Concept to Campaign

For a long time, Hyperjacking was discussed primarily as a theoretical threat or demonstrated only in controlled "proof of concept" environments. The complexity of accessing and subverting the hypervisor layer made it seem like a distant possibility.

Proof of Concept (PoC): In cybersecurity, a demonstration that a particular vulnerability exists and can be exploited, or that a specific attack method is feasible, often without causing actual harm or being fully weaponized.

However, events in recent years have shifted this perception:

• The VENOM Vulnerability (CVE-2015-3456): Revealed in May 2015, VENOM (Virtual Environment Neglected Operations Manipulation) was a critical vulnerability found in the virtual floppy disk controller code used by many hypervisors (including Xen, KVM, VirtualBox, and VMware). While not strictly a Hyperjacking technique in itself, it was a significant vulnerability that could potentially be leveraged as part of an attack chain leading to a VM escape and potentially hypervisor compromise. It highlighted that even seemingly innocuous virtual hardware components could harbor deep flaws affecting the hypervisor layer. VENOM's widespread impact across different virtualization platforms underscored the shared codebase and potential risks inherent in the hypervisor ecosystem.
• Mandiant/VMware Report (September 2022): This was a pivotal moment. Cybersecurity firm Mandiant and VMware jointly disclosed findings of a sophisticated, state-sponsored threat actor successfully executing malware-based hyperjacking attacks in the wild. This confirmed that hyperjacking had moved beyond theory and PoC into active use by advanced adversaries in espionage campaigns. The specific details often remain under wraps, but this public confirmation validated hyperjacking as a tangible, albeit rare, threat. The attack involved sophisticated malware designed to implant itself within the hypervisor environment (specifically VMware ESXi), giving the attacker persistent, stealthy control over the guest VMs.

These events underscore that while difficult, directly targeting the hypervisor is a real capability possessed by highly skilled attackers, particularly those with significant resources and motivation (like state-sponsored groups).

Defense Against the Underworld: Mitigating Hyperjacking Risks

Protecting against Hyperjacking requires a layered security approach, focusing on hardening the hypervisor and the surrounding infrastructure:

1. Isolate Hypervisor Management: The network traffic and interfaces used for managing the hypervisor itself should be completely separate from the networks used by the guest VMs or regular corporate traffic. This minimizes the attack surface accessible from compromised VMs or standard network entry points.
2. Restrict Guest OS Access: Guest operating systems and users within VMs should never have direct access to hypervisor management interfaces or tools. Management agents or tools should be installed and used only on dedicated, hardened management workstations or servers, not within the VMs they manage. This prevents a compromise inside a VM from directly leading to hypervisor access.
3. Patching and Updates: Regularly and promptly patching the hypervisor software and the host operating system (if applicable) is crucial. Hypervisor vendors continuously discover and fix vulnerabilities, including those that could potentially lead to hypervisor compromise or VM escape. Keeping the hypervisor up-to-date is the most fundamental defense against known exploits.
4. Least Privilege: Apply the principle of least privilege to accounts and processes involved in hypervisor management. Limit who has access to the hypervisor control plane and restrict their permissions only to what is necessary.
5. Hardening the Host: If a Type 2 hypervisor is used (running on a standard OS), the security of the underlying host OS is paramount. This includes OS patching, configuration hardening, and minimizing installed software. For Type 1 hypervisors (bare-metal), focus on the security of the hypervisor itself and its management console.
6. Monitoring and Auditing: While difficult, attempt to monitor the hypervisor layer for unexpected behavior or changes. This might involve specialized security tools designed for virtualized environments, or analyzing logs from the hypervisor itself for unusual activity, access attempts, or configuration modifications.

Further Exploration: Related Concepts

Understanding Hyperjacking connects to several other advanced security topics:

• Blue Pill / Red Pill: Concepts exploring how an attacker might detect if they are running inside a VM ("Red Pill") or subvert the virtualization layer to run beneath the OS ("Blue Pill").
• Qubes OS: An operating system designed with security through isolation in mind, using virtualization to compartmentalize different activities into separate VMs managed by a microkernel-based hypervisor (Xen). While not an attack technique, its architecture highlights the security benefits of leveraging hypervisor-level isolation.
• Virtual Machine Escape: A critical prerequisite or component in many potential hypervisor compromise scenarios, allowing an attacker to move from a less privileged VM environment to the more privileged hypervisor or host.

Hyperjacking represents a significant threat because it targets the trust boundary of virtualization. As more critical infrastructure moves into virtualized and cloud environments, understanding the potential for attacks at this fundamental layer becomes increasingly important for both attackers and defenders operating at the deepest levels of system security. This is one of the forbidden techniques because it requires not just exploiting software flaws, but understanding the intricate relationship between hardware, hypervisor, and guest systems, and how to break that chain of trust from the bottom up.